Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1396/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1396A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to failure to prove the date of notification of the judgment.

Case Number AUTO 1396/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don José Antonio Sánchez Sánchez against his conviction for theft. The applicant argued that the procedural rights under Article 24.2 of the Constitution were violated, but the Court found the date of notification of the final judgment was not substantiated. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the necessary procedural prerequisites for filing a constitutional remedy were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 54.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal for protection of rights if the applicant fails to prove the date of notification of the final judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal procedural notification right to defense criminal conviction inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.
Art. 54.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1335-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.335/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada.

Don José Antonio Sánchez Sánchez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 33 de Madrid, confirmada por la de la Audiencia Provincial, condenatoria por delito de hurto. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el

art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers