Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1389/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1389A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to procedural expiration and lack of constitutional content in the claim.

Case Number AUTO 1389/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Secundino Díez Rodríguez against a labor court decision. The applicant argued that the dismissal of his re-hiring request violated his right to a court under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the claim lacked constitutional substance. Furthermore, the court determined that the procedural time limits had expired, rendering the action time-barred.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 40.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal when the claim lacks constitutional content or when the procedural time limits for filing the action have expired.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration constitutional appeal lack of constitutional content time-barred action right to court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 40.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1229-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.229/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Secundino Díez Rodríguez interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto del T.C.T. que, en queja, confirma el de la Magistratura de Trabajo de Palencia que, en incidente de no readmisión, acordó no haber lugar a tener por interpuesto recurso de suplicación.

Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers