Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1375/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1375A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration and lack of fundamental rights violation.

Case Number AUTO 1375/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don José Puntas Ramírez against a lower court's eviction order. The applicant argued that the procedural delays violated his right to a court under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the claim time-barred and the evidence denial insufficient to constitute a fundamental rights violation. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the action had expired and the content of the demand lacked constitutional merit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 44.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal when the procedural action has expired due to time limits and when the denial of evidence does not amount to a violation of the right to a court.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration time bar action right to court evidence denial fundamental rights violation appeal inadmissibility constitutional merit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 44.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 999-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 999/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Prueba: su denegación no constituye violación de derecho fundamental. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Puntas Ramírez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Sevilla que confirma la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 8 de Sevilla en autos sobre interdicto de recobrar. Invoca la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01375-1987_00999.pdf