Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1365/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1365A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to applicant's indefensibility and lack of constitutional content in the claim.

Case Number AUTO 1365/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Juan Antonio Tamayo Idarreta against a Supreme Court ruling regarding an expropriation dispute. The applicant argued a violation of Article 24 of the Constitution, but the Court found the claim lacked constitutional content and was attributable to the applicant's own indefensibility. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without further examination of the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal when the claim lacks constitutional content or is attributable to the applicant's indefensibility, thereby preventing the court from examining the alleged rights violation.

Keywords

AI generated
indefensibility constitutional content Article 24 CE expropriation dispute recurso de amparo

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 927-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 927/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Juan Antonio Tamayo Idarreta interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo y de la Sala Especial de Revisión, en recurso sobre nulidad de actuaciones en expediente expropiatorio de fincas. Invoca la vulneración

de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01365-1987_00927.pdf