Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1360/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1360A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the legal action period.

Case Number AUTO 1360/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Félix Castrogeriz Arrocha Rodríguez and others against a Supreme Court ruling. The applicants argued that their rights under the Spanish Constitution were violated by a regulation concerning school directors. The court rejected the claim because the legal action had expired due to the lapse of the statutory time limit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 43.1 C.E.; Art. 44 C.E.: The constitutional appeal is inadmissible when the action is declared time-barred due to the expiration of the procedural period established by law.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal procedural expiration time bar legal action statutory period

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 43.1 C.E.
Art. 44 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 882-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 882/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Don Félix Castrogeriz Arrocha Rodríguez y otra interponen recurso de amparo contra Real Decreto 816/1986, que regula situaciones de los funcionarios del Cuerpo de Directores Escolares, y Sentencia desestimatoria de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo.

Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9.3, 10.2, 14, 24, 33.3, 103 y 105 a) y c) C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers