Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1356/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1356A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration and lack of effective judicial protection.

Case Number AUTO 1356/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural deadlines had expired and the petitioners failed to exhaust judicial remedies. The applicants argued that the exclusion from eviction enforcement proceedings violated their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The Court rejected this claim, ruling that the lapse of time and the absence of a specific judicial decision against the applicants rendered the constitutional complaint procedurally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine appeals filed after the expiration of the statutory time limits or when the petitioners are not parties to the underlying enforcement proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration effective judicial protection eviction enforcement exhaustion of remedies constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 800-1987

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 800/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: irregularidades procesales. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña María Antonia García Rico y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra providencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 21 de Madrid que no tiene por parte a los recurrentes en las diligencias de ejecución de Sentencia firme de juicio de desahucio y contra

resoluciones posteriores dictadas en esta fase de ejecución. Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01356-1987_00800.pdf