Constitutional appeal dismissed due to failure to prove notification date and lack of formal invocation of rights.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Ernesto García Campos against a Supreme Court sentence confirming a municipal fine. The applicant argued that his rights under Article 33 of the Constitution were violated regarding the revocation of works, but the court found no evidence of the notification date and noted a failure to formally invoke the specific right claimed. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because procedural requirements for admissibility were not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 33 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible when the applicant fails to prove the date of notification of the contested decision and does not formally invoke the specific constitutional right alleged to be violated.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1124-1987
Fecha de resolución
23/11/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.124/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.
Don Ernesto García Campos interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Cuarta del Tribunal Supremo que revoca la dictada por la Audiencia Territorial de Madrid y confirma sanción impuesta por el Ayuntamiento por obras de revoco. Invoca la
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 33 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers