Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1301/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1301A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal as untimely and lacks constitutional content regarding right to effective judicial protection.

Case Number AUTO 1301/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to its untimely filing and lack of constitutional merit. The applicant, Jesús Ramos Pérez, sought protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution after judges dismissed his fraud charges. The court rejected the claim because the remedy was filed too late and the underlying facts did not demonstrate a violation of constitutional rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 44.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal if it is filed after the statutory deadline or if the contested resolution does not contain a violation of constitutional rights.

Keywords

AI generated
untimely appeal effective judicial protection constitutional content dismissal of charges right to defense

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 44.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 890-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/11/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 890/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales:recurso extemporáneo. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Jesús Ramos Pérez interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 24 de Madrid, confirmadas por Auto de la Sección Sexta de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, que acuerdan sobreseimiento y archivo de una denuncia

deducida por presunto delito de apropiación indebida. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01301-1987_00890.pdf