Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1288/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1288A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to administrative hearing absence.

Case Number AUTO 1288/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Prefabricados 333 against demolition orders confirmed by the Supreme Court. The company argued that the lack of a hearing in the administrative proceedings violated Article 24 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that the absence of an oral hearing did not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection does not require an oral hearing in administrative proceedings when the law permits written procedure and the parties have had full opportunity to present their case.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection oral hearing requirement administrative procedure Article 24 Constitution inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24 C.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 770-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/11/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 770/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: audiencia en expediente administrativo. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Prefabricados 333, Sociedad Limitada», interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones del Ayuntamiento de Elche, que acordaron la demolición de una nave industrial, confirmadas en vía judicial por Sentencia de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo.

Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24 C. E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01288-1987_00770.pdf