Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1266/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1266A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding presumption of innocence due to lack of specific constitutional demand content.

Case Number AUTO 1266/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Ahmed Chaibi against his conviction for robbery with intimidation. Chaibi argued that the proceedings violated his rights under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution, specifically concerning the presumption of innocence and the right to defense. The Court rejected the claim because the appeal lacked the specific content required by law to challenge the trial's procedural conduct.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.; The appeal must contain specific allegations regarding the violation of constitutional rights; a generic claim without detailed factual or legal grounds fails to meet the admissibility requirements for suspending execution.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence constitutional appeal admissibility specific content requirement right to defense suspension of execution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1094-1987

Fecha de resolución

10/11/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.094/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Ahmed Chaibi interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 9 de Madrid, confirmada en apelación por la Audiencia Provincial, en causa por delito de robo con intimidación a las personas. Invoca la vulneración de los

derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01266-1987_01094.pdf