Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1248/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1248A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of effective judicial protection claim.

Case Number AUTO 1248/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to demonstrate a violation of effective judicial protection. The applicant argued that the Supreme Court's suspension of administrative proceedings infringed his rights under Article 24 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that since the applicant did not exhaust available judicial remedies or prove the suspension violated his rights, the claim lacked constitutional content.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when a court suspends proceedings pending the resolution of a prior administrative claim, provided the suspension does not deprive the party of any substantive right.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection suspension of proceedings administrative indemnification exhaustion of remedies constitutional appeal admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 886-1987

Fecha de resolución

10/11/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 886/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Vallés Canet interpone recurso de amparo contra Autos de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que suspenden la tramitación del recurso contencioso-administrativo contra actos del Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Urbanismo sobre indemnización

de daños y perjuicios. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01248-1987_00886.pdf