Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1245/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1245A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and defective complaint content.

Case Number AUTO 1245/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to procedural defects and a lack of effective judicial protection. The applicant, MACOSA, argued that the lower court's decision violated their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution regarding cafeteria regulations. The Court rejected this claim because the applicant failed to substantiate the alleged violation and did not exhaust necessary procedural remedies.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate a violation of effective judicial protection or if the complaint lacks the required constitutional content.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection constitutional complaint admissibility procedural defects exhaustion of remedies labor cafeteria regulations

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 865-1987

Fecha de resolución

10/11/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 865/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: subsanación. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Material y Construcciones, Sociedad Anónima» (MACOSA), interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo que estima recurso de suplicación contra la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 11 de Valencia, en Auto sobre

normas y funcionamientos de los comedores de la empresa. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01245-1987_00865.pdf