Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1234/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1234A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to procedural defects and lack of effective judicial protection.

Case Number AUTO 1234/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, citing procedural flaws and a lack of effective judicial protection. The applicant argued that the labor court's revocation of a dismissal judgment violated his right to a fair trial and presumption of innocence. The court rejected these claims because the notification date was properly established, the proceedings were congruent, and no violation of the principle of contradiction was found.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The Constitutional Court must dismiss an appeal if procedural deadlines are met, the judgment is congruent, and no effective violation of the right to a fair trial or presumption of innocence is demonstrated.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Court Appeal inadmissibility Procedural deadlines Presumption of innocence Effective judicial protection Labor dispute Principle of contradiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 739-1987

Fecha de resolución

10/11/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 739/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación acreditada. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Principio de contradicción: no violado. Contenido

constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antolín Altonaga Léniz interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo revocatoria de la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 1 de Vizcaya en autos sobre despido. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados

en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01234-1987_00739.pdf