Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1230/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1230A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for appointment of court-appointed lawyer due to lack of fundamental rights violation.

Case Number AUTO 1230/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for amparo filed by a convicted robber seeking a court-appointed lawyer. The applicants argued that the denial of such representation violated their right to a fair trial under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found no violation of fundamental rights in the procedural outcome. Consequently, the request for a court-appointed lawyer was rejected as it did not constitute a breach of constitutional guarantees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The denial of a court-appointed lawyer does not constitute a violation of the right to a fair trial when the applicant fails to demonstrate a specific fundamental rights infringement.

Keywords

AI generated
right to fair trial court-appointed lawyer presumption of innocence procedural guarantees constitutional appeal fundamental rights violation legal representation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicitan el nombramiento de Procurador del turno de oficio.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 571-1987

Fecha de resolución

10/11/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 571/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Prueba: su denegación no constituye violación de derecho fundamental. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Angel Manuel Ruiz Mena y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Cuarta de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, confirmada por la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, que condenó por delito de robo. Invocan la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicitan el nombramiento de Procurador del turno de oficio.

containers

Visualización

containers