Constitutional court dismisses amparo claim for lack of standing due to absence of lawyer.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court filed the proceedings without resolving the merits of the amparo claim. The applicant, Faried Jazan, requested a court-appointed lawyer to challenge a denial of provisional release, alleging a violation of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the applicant failed to demonstrate the necessary legal standing to file the remedy without counsel.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 14 CE: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine an amparo claim filed by a party who has not been represented by a lawyer, as the right to effective judicial protection presupposes legal capacity to act.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 227-1987
Fecha de resolución
10/11/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando el archivo de las actuaciones en el procedimiento 227/1987
Resumen
Demanda de amparo: inexistencia.
Don Faried Jazan solicita la designación de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio, a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra resolución denegatoria de libertad provisional. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers