Constitutional Court dismisses appeal when Supreme Court fails to rule on previously admitted second ground.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court granted the actor's request for withdrawal of the appeal against a Supreme Court conviction for parricide. The applicant argued that the Supreme Court violated Articles 14 and 24.1 of the Constitution by failing to rule on the second ground of the appeal, which had been previously admitted. The Court decided to dismiss the appeal because the Supreme Court's omission of the admitted ground justified the actor's withdrawal, rendering the constitutional complaint moot.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: When a Supreme Court fails to rule on a ground of a constitutional appeal that was previously admitted, the applicant may withdraw the appeal, and the Constitutional Court will dismiss the complaint.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 38-1986
Fecha de resolución
10/11/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando haber lugar al desistimiento del actor en el recurso de amparo 38/1986, promovido en causa penal.
Síntesis Analítica
Desistimiento: procedencia.
Resumen
Recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que confirma la de la Audiencia Provincial de Valencia, condenatoria por parricidio. Invoca como vulnerados los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24.1 C.E, porque la Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo no resuelve sobre el motivo segundo del recurso, que fue previamente admitido.
containers
Visualización
containers