Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1176/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1176A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights and insufficient demand content.

Case Number AUTO 1176/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a formal defect in the invocation of rights and a lack of sufficient content in the demand. The applicants, convicted of negligence, argued violations of equality and due process rights under Articles 14 and 24 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that the formal requirements for invoking constitutional rights were not met, necessitating dismissal at the procedural stage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the formal invocation of rights is lacking or the demand fails to specify the constitutional content sufficiently.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation defect insufficient demand content procedural inadmissibility constitutional rights appeal due process requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.
consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 807-1987

Fecha de resolución

26/10/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 807/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Ramón Uría Quirós y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencias del Juzgado de Distrito de Villaviciosa y del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 4 de Gijón, condenatorias por delito de imprudencia. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos

consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las Sentencias recurridas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01176-1987_00807.pdf