Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to exhaust judicial remedies and procedural time bar.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust judicial remedies and the procedural deadline had expired. Don José Romero Diz sought protection of his rights under Article 24 of the Constitution after being convicted of public disorder, but the Supreme Court had already confirmed the lower court's judgment. The Court ruled that the action was time-barred and the requirement to pursue all available judicial avenues was not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 24.2 C.E.: The right to judicial protection is conditional upon the exhaustion of ordinary legal remedies and strict adherence to procedural time limits.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 774-1987
Fecha de resolución
26/10/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 774/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Agotamiento de recursos en la vía judicial: inexistencia. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.
Don José Romero Diz interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que confirma la dictada por la Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra, condenatoria por delito de desórdenes públicos. Invoca la vulneración de los
derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01171-1987_00774.pdf