Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1163/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1163A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to formally invoke Article 24.2 CE rights.

Case Number AUTO 1163/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to formally invoke the right to a court under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. Although the applicant requested a suspension of the criminal sentence, the court found no evidence that the procedural deadline for notification had been violated. Consequently, the court ruled that the necessary formal invocation of the constitutional right was absent, leading to the rejection of the remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 10.1 LEC: The Constitutional Court requires the formal invocation of the right to a court; failure to do so renders the appeal inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation of rights procedural deadlines suspension of execution Article 24.2 CE inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 10.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 743-1987

Fecha de resolución

26/10/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 743/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación acreditada. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

Don José Díaz García interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 3 de Jaén, confirmada por la Audiencia Provincial, que condenó por delito de estafa. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01163-1987_00743.pdf