Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1120/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1120A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to missing content in the lawsuit.

Case Number AUTO 1120/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Mr. Lozano Garrido against eviction proceedings. Although the applicant claimed a violation of the right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, the court found the underlying demand lacked the necessary constitutional content. Consequently, the court ruled that no violation of the right to effective judicial protection occurred because the substantive claim itself was deficient.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection is not violated when the underlying claim lacks the necessary constitutional content to constitute a justiciable injury.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection constitutional content of demand inadmissibility of appeal eviction proceedings Article 24 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 673-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/10/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 673/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José María Lozano Garrido interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 10 de Madrid y la confirmatoria de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial, en autos sobre resolución de arrendamiento urbano. Invoca la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers