Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1109/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1109A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to failure to exhaust judicial remedies, as exhaustion was not attributable to the applicant.

Case Number AUTO 1109/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the amparo inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust judicial remedies, a procedural requirement not attributable to her. The applicants challenged a labor court decision regarding the transfer of a hospital center, arguing violations of freedom of thought and belief under Article 16 of the Constitution. The court ruled that since the exhaustion of remedies was not the applicant's fault, the constitutional complaint could not proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 43.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an amparo inadmissible when the exhaustion of judicial remedies is not attributable to the applicant, even if the underlying claim concerns fundamental rights.

Keywords

AI generated
exhaustion of remedies non-attributable failure labor dispute freedom of thought constitutional appeal procedural requirement inadmissible amparo

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 43.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 542-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/10/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 524/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Agotamiento de recursos en la vía judicial: incumplimiento del requisito no imputable al recurrente. Libertad de ideas y creencias: relaciones laborales. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Elisa Isabel Farpon Canero y otras interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que declara mal preparada la apelación contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso- Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial

de Valladolid que declaró procedente el traslado de las recurrentes acordado por la Dirección del centro hospitalario. Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagado en el art. 16 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01109-1987_00542.pdf