Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of standing and failure to prove equality violation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Pedro Vargas Mendoza against a denial of provisional release. The petitioner requested appointment to a public defender's office to claim a violation of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the petitioner lacked standing to challenge the administrative resolution and failed to demonstrate a concrete equality issue.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine appeals against administrative resolutions denying provisional release unless the applicant demonstrates a direct violation of equality rights and possesses standing to challenge the specific administrative act.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 226-1987
Fecha de resolución
13/10/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 226/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Copia de la resolución recaída: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Pedro Vargas Mendoza solicita la designación de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fin de interponer recurso de amparo contra resolución denegatoria de libertad provisional. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01100-1987_00226.pdf