Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1097/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1097A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal against fraud conviction, ruling judicial discretion on evidence is not a violation of due process rights.

Case Number AUTO 1097/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by a defendant convicted of fraud against two lower court judgments. The petitioner argued that the lower courts violated his right to a fair trial by exercising broad discretion in evaluating evidence. The court ruled that the assessment of evidence remains within the exclusive competence of the ordinary judiciary and does not constitute a constitutional violation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The evaluation of evidence and the appreciation of facts by the ordinary judiciary are matters of judicial discretion that do not require constitutional review unless arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial discretion evidence appraisal due process rights fraud conviction constitutional appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2-1987

Fecha de resolución

13/10/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Prueba: su apreciación corresponde al Juez. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Antonio Navarro González interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción de Puertollano y contra la Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Ciudad Real dictada en recurso de apelación, confirmatoria de la anterior que

condenó al promovente del amparo por un delito de estafa. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers