Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1085/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1085A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection regarding damages calculation.

Case Number AUTO 1085/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Rodrigo de Santiago against a lower court's decision on damages for negligence. The appellant argued that the fixed damages violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court rejected this claim, finding no constitutional defect in the procedural execution of the sentence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 116.1 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection does not require a specific method for calculating damages, and the execution of a final judgment by a lower court does not constitute a violation of constitutional guarantees.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection damages calculation negligence liability execution of judgments constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.
Art. 116.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 907-1987

Fecha de resolución

30/09/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 907/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: ejecución de Sentencias. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Alfredo Rodrigo de Santiago interpone recurso de amparo contra providencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 31, Auto del mismo y Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 6, en autos sobre condena por falta de negligencia, en cuanto a la fijación de

daños a efectos de reparación. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C. E.

containers

Visualización

containers