Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1084/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1084A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of congruence and incidental declaration of judgment.

Case Number AUTO 1084/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by 'Productos y Cultivos del Sur, S.A.' against a labor court judgment confirming a collective conflict ruling. The company argued that the lower court violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the appeal lacked congruence with the facts and the contested judgment was incidentally declared. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the applicant failed to demonstrate a direct constitutional violation linked to the specific proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires strict congruence between the appeal's claims and the facts of the contested judgment, rejecting appeals based on incidental declarations of judgment that do not directly implicate the applicant's constitutional rights.

Keywords

AI generated
Principle of congruence Incidental declaration of judgment Article 24.1 Constitution Lack of congruence Collective labor conflict

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Artículo 24 Constitución española, de 27 de diciembre de 1978

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 895-1987

Fecha de resolución

30/09/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 895/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de congruencia: calificación de los hechos. Indefensión: declaración incidental de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Productos y Cultivos del Sur, S.A.», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo que confirma la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 2 de Murcia en autos sobre conflicto colectivo. Invoca la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

disposiciones citadas

containers

Constitución española, de 27 de diciembre de 1978

Artículo 24

Visualización

containers