Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1071/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1071A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of admissibility due to absence of specific constitutional demand content. The court rejected the claim regarding the closure of a bar. The applicant failed to meet the strict requirements for constitutional protection. The decision upholds the principle that constitutional appeals require precise legal grounds. The court found the procedural requirements were not satisfied. The ruling emphasizes the necessity of clear constitutional arguments. The outcome reflects the strict interpretation of admissibility criteria. The case highlights the importance of procedural compliance in constitutional litigation.

Case Number AUTO 1071/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Antonio Arjona Ondiveros against the closure of a bar. The applicant argued that the proceedings violated his rights to judicial protection and presumption of innocence under Articles 24.2 and 25.1 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the specific constitutional demands lacked the necessary content and precision required for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 24.2 and 25.1 of the Constitution; The Constitutional Court requires precise and specific constitutional demands in appeals, rejecting those that merely assert general grievances without identifying the exact constitutional right violated and the specific legal defect in the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal admissibility specific constitutional demand presumption of innocence judicial protection rights procedural requirements content of the claim closure of establishment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 24.2 of the Constitution
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.2 y 25.1 C.E.
Article 25.1 of the Constitution

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 608-1987

Fecha de resolución

30/09/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 608/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Principio de legaiidad penal: tipificación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio Arjona Ondiveros interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo confirmatoria de la dictada por la Sala Tercera de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Barcelona en recurso contra

resolución que acordó la clausura de un bar. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.2 y 25.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01071-1987_00608.pdf