Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1058/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1058A AI generated

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to unproven notification date causing procedural expiration of the action.

Case Number AUTO 1058/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Spanish Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Michael Armini against a denial of provisional release. Armini argued violations of equality, personal liberty, and right to defense, but failed to prove the date of notification to the court. The court ruled that without verified notification dates, the statutory time limit for filing the appeal had expired, barring further review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 44.1 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction when the appeal is time-barred due to unproven notification dates, as procedural expiration extinguishes the right to judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration notification date proof constitutional appeal time bar provisional release right to defense jurisdictional bar

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 44.1 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1057-1986

Fecha de resolución

30/09/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.057/1986

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha notificación no acreditada; caducidad de la acción.

Don Michael Armini interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sección Tercera de la Sala de lo Penal de la Audiencia Nacional que deniega la libertad provisional del recurrente, y providencia ulterior que deniega un recurso de súplica. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los artículos 14, 17.1 y 24 C.E. Solicita la designación de Abogado y Procurador de oficio.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_01058-1986_01057.pdf