Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1054/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:1054A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to lack of legal issue.

Case Number AUTO 1054/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection against the lack of effective judicial remedy filed by tenants whose eviction was annulled. The applicants argued that the summary proceedings under the Mortgage Law violated their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court rejected this claim because the underlying legal issue was not contested and the right to judicial protection had not been violated.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal for protection inadmissible when the legal issue is not contested and the right to effective judicial protection has not been violated.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection summary proceedings eviction annulment lack of legal issue inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.
Art. 131 Ley Hipotecaria
1 de Cáceres, en juicio sumario del art. 131 de la

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 920-1987

Fecha de resolución

23/09/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 920/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: derecho no violado; cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Joaquín Gutiérrez Sánchez y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Cáceres que confirma resoluciones del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 1 de Cáceres, en juicio sumario del art. 131 de la

Ley Hipotecaria, por las que se deja sin efecto el desalojo y lanzamiento de los arrendatarios de los locales objeto de la subasta. Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el artículo 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers