Constitutional appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to prior acts predating the Constitution's entry into force.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Teófilo Armendáriz Garayoa against a Supreme Court ruling confirming an agricultural concentration agreement. The applicants argued that their rights under Article 24 of the Constitution were violated by the procedural history. The court rejected this claim because the underlying administrative acts occurred before the Constitution became effective, rendering the constitutional protection inapplicable.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Constitutional appeals are inadmissible when the contested acts were performed prior to the entry into force of the Constitution, as the constitutional rights invoked did not exist at that time.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 903-1987
Fecha de resolución
16/09/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 903/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Actos anteriores a la Constitución: emplazamiento. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Teófilo Armendáriz Garayoa y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala Cuarta del Tribunal Supremo que confirma otro anterior que tienen por desistido del recurso contra Resolución del Ministerio de Agricultura sobre Acuerdo de la
Comisión Central de Concentración Parcelaria. Invocan la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers