Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 982/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:982A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against criminal conviction citing lack of procedural violations.

Case Number AUTO 982/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by Don José Ruiz Hernández against his criminal conviction. The petitioner alleged violations of constitutional rights regarding the presumption of innocence, lack of information by the public defender, and absence of witnesses. The court found no grounds to overturn the lower court's judgment based on these claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 17 CE: The Constitutional Court does not intervene in criminal judgments absent clear procedural violations or infringement of fundamental rights.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal conviction appeal presumption of innocence public defender rights witness absence constitutional protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 CE
Invoca como vulnerados los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 17, 18, 24 y 25 C.E.
Art. 17 CE
Art. 18 CE
Art. 24 CE
Art. 25 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 240-1986

Fecha de resolución

09/09/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando el archivo de las actuaciones en el procedimiento 240/1986

Resumen

Demanda de amparo: inexistencia.

Don José Ruiz Hernández interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Cuarta de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona en la que resultó condenado. Invoca como vulnerados los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 17, 18, 24 y 25 C.E.

(presunción de inocencia, falta de información por parte del Abogado de oficio y carencia de testigos en la vista oral).

containers

Visualización

containers