Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 898/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:898A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to insufficient sentence motivation.

Case Number AUTO 898/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Mr. Benítez Iniesta against a criminal conviction. The petitioner argued that Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution were violated by the lack of adequate reasoning in the final judgment. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the absence of detailed motivation in the sentence did not constitute a breach of the right to effective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection is not violated by a lack of detailed motivation in a criminal sentence if the decision remains legally sound and the procedural guarantees were respected.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection lack of motivation criminal conviction appeal constitutional rights procedural guarantees

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 de la C.E.
Art. 24.2 C.E.
de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 de la C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 283-1987

Fecha de resolución

15/07/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 283/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Copia de la resolución recaída: no falta. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Javier Benítez Iniesta interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 8 de Barcelona, confirmada en apelación por la Audiencia Provincial, que condena por delito de resistencia y lesiones. Invoca la vulneración

de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 de la C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers