Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 866/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:866A AI generated

Social Security appeal dismissed due to unproven notification date and lack of effective judicial protection.

Case Number AUTO 866/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the Social Security's appeal against a labor court decision regarding a pension. The applicant argued that the notification date was not proven, violating effective judicial protection, but the court found no evidence of this procedural defect. Consequently, the court ruled that the lack of proof meant the effective protection of judges and tribunals was not compromised.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 10.1 LEC: When the notification date of a judicial decision is not proven, the principle of effective judicial protection is not violated if the procedural timeline remains valid and the party's rights were not prejudiced.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection notification date proof procedural timeline validity social security appeal labor court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 de la C.E.
Art. 10.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 302-1987

Fecha de resolución

08/07/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 302/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: hechos probados. Principio de congruencia: inexistencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

El Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto del Tribunal Central de Trabajo que declara improcedente recurso de suplicación contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 2 de Gerona, en autos sobre

jubilación. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 de la C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers