Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to procedural defects.
Spain (ES)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Doña Máxima Escamilla against a labor court judgment denying her pension. She argued this violated her right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the court found the underlying demand lacked constitutional content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the initial judicial decision did not meet the threshold for constitutional review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine appeals when the underlying judicial decision is procedurally flawed or lacks constitutional content, thereby precluding the effective judicial protection required by Article 24.1.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 456-1987
Fecha de resolución
01/07/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 456/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: advertencia judicial. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Doña Máxima Escamilla Escamilla interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 23 de Madrid, que desestimó demanda sobre pensión de jubilación. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 de la C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers