Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 832/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:832A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to failure to cure defects and lack of constitutional content.

Case Number AUTO 832/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible for procedural defects and lack of constitutional substance. Conrado Prinz Machín challenged a civil court divorce judgment, alleging violations of judicial protection and legal certainty under Articles 9 and 24.1 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the applicant failed to cure the demand's defects and the request lacked sufficient constitutional content.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 9 and 24.1 of the Constitution: An appeal is inadmissible if the applicant fails to cure procedural defects or if the request lacks the necessary constitutional content to justify constitutional protection.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Appeal Procedural Defects Judicial Protection Legal Certainty Constitutional Content Inadmissibility Divorce Judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Articles 9 and 24.1 of the Constitution
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9 y 24.1 de la C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 390-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/07/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 390/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: no subsanación. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Conrado Prinz Machín interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria que revoca, en parte, la dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 3 en autos sobre divorcio.

Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 9 y 24.1 de la C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers