Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 829/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:829A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of congruence between the complaint and the contested judgment facts.

Case Number AUTO 829/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don José Bouzas Bouzo against a partial ruling convicting him for embezzlement. The applicant alleged violations of rights under Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution, but the Court found the complaint lacked congruence with the specific facts of the contested decision. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the constitutional arguments did not correspond to the actual legal issues raised in the lower court's judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 2 CE: The principle of congruence requires that constitutional complaints address the specific facts and legal grounds of the contested decision; a complaint failing to correspond to the actual content of the judgment is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
principle of congruence constitutional appeal inadmissibility lack of congruence content of the demand factual qualification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 de la C.
Art. 2 CE
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 de la C.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 322-1987

Fecha de resolución

01/07/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 322/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de congruencia: calificación de los hechos. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Bouzas Bouzo interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de San Sebastián que estima, en parte, recurso de apelación interpuesto contra la dictada por el Juzgado de Instrucción de Vergara y condena por delito de

alzamiento de bienes. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 de la C. E.

containers

Visualización

containers