Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 802/1987 ECLI:ES:TC:1987:802A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights and defective defense in processing order.

Case Number AUTO 802/1987
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a formal defect in invoking rights and a lack of defense. Don Félix Castán Baeza challenged a processing order for alleged disobedience, claiming violations of Articles 14 and 24.1 of the Constitution, but failed to properly invoke these rights or present a defense. The court ruled that without a formal invocation and adequate defense, the appeal could not proceed to substantive review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution; The appeal is inadmissible if the formal invocation of the right is lacking or if the defense is defective.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation of rights defective defense in proceedings inadmissibility of constitutional appeal processing order for disobedience lack of procedural defense

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Articles 14 and 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution
derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24.1 y 2 de la C.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 488-1987

Fecha de resolución

24/06/1987

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 488/1987

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Indefensión: Auto de procesamiento. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Félix Castán Baeza interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto del Juzgado de Instrucción de Vélez-Málaga, confirmatorio de otro por el que se decreta el procesamiento del recurrente por presunto delito de desobediencia. Invoca la vulneración de los

derechos consagrados en los arts. 14 y 24.1 y 2 de la C. E. Solicita la suspensión de los Autos recurridos.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1987/1987_00802-1987_00488.pdf