Constitutional court dismisses appeal as applicant withdrew, noting no substantive rights violation occurred.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal admissible but granted the applicant's request for withdrawal, resulting in the dismissal of the case. Proasa Sevilla, S.A. had challenged a bankruptcy court order via an appeal for protection of constitutional rights, alleging violations of the right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court ruled that since the applicant voluntarily withdrew the appeal, no further judicial review was necessary, and the underlying bankruptcy proceedings continued unaffected.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 44.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court may declare an appeal for protection of constitutional rights admissible but dismiss it if the applicant withdraws the appeal, as no substantive violation of rights requires further examination.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.
Identificación
Órgano
Sala Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León, don Antonio Truyol Serra, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 274-1987
Fecha de resolución
24/06/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando haber lugar al desistimiento del actor en el recurso de amparo 274/1987
Resumen
Desistimiento: procedencia.
Proasa Sevilla, S. A., interpone recurso de amparo contra la resolución del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 10 de Madrid, que acuerda exhorto al de Primera Instancia núm. 2 de Sevilla, en autos de quiebra necesaria. Invoca la vulneración de los
derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 de la C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la resolución y los exhortos impugnados.
containers
Visualización
containers