Constitutional court dismisses appeal against dismissal based on equality clause due to lack of constitutional content.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Santiago Carreñas Colina against a labor court judgment confirming his dismissal. The applicant invoked Article 14 of the Constitution, claiming a violation of the principle of equality, but the court found the claim lacked sufficient constitutional content. Consequently, the appeal was not admitted for further examination as it did not meet the threshold for constitutional review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 14 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires a claim to possess sufficient constitutional content to be admitted, rejecting appeals that merely reiterate ordinary legal arguments without demonstrating a direct violation of fundamental rights.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 256-1987
Fecha de resolución
24/06/1987
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 256/1987
Resumen
Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: interpretación de las leyes. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Santiago Carreñas Colina interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo que confirma la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 20 de Madrid en autos sobre despido. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el
art. 14 de la C. E.
containers
Visualización
containers