Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 548/1986 ECLI:ES:TC:1986:548A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of violated rights in criminal conviction.

Case Number AUTO 548/1986
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to formally invoke the specific constitutional rights violated by the criminal conviction. The applicant, convicted under Article 344 of the Penal Code, requested free legal aid but did not explicitly cite the constitutional articles at issue. The court ruled that without a formal invocation of the right, the appeal lacks the necessary content to proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to judicial protection requires the formal invocation of the specific constitutional right allegedly violated; without such invocation, the appeal is inadmissible for lack of content.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation of rights inadmissible appeal lack of content constitutional protection criminal conviction appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 24.1 CE
art. 344 del Código Penal
22/1985, por la que se le condena como autor del delito tipificado en el art. 344 del Código Penal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1103-1986

Fecha de resolución

25/06/1986

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.103/1985

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Juan Manuel Esquinas Sánchez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción de Teruel en procedimiento especial núm. 22/1985, por la que se le condena como autor del delito tipificado en el art. 344 del Código Penal. Solicita

el beneficio de justicia gratuita.

containers

Visualización

containers