Constitutional court dismisses appeal regarding unequal provisional imprisonment based on crime severity.
Spain (ES)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by George Edward Lipinsky against his unconditional provisional imprisonment. Lipinsky argued that the measure violated the principle of equality by not considering the gravity of his alleged crime. The court rejected this claim, finding no constitutional defect in the judicial decision to impose such a restrictive measure.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 14 C.E.; The principle of equality does not require identical treatment for all defendants when the gravity of the alleged offense justifies differentiated provisional measures.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1018-1985
Fecha de resolución
19/03/1986
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.018/1985
Resumen
Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: gravedad del acto delictivo imputado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don George Edward Lipinsky interpone recurso de amparo contra Autos de la Audiencia Provincial de Palma de Mallorca que acuerdan la prisión provisional incondicional del recurrente. Invoca como violado el art. 14 C.E. y solicita la suspensión del juicio
oral.
containers
Visualización
containers