Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
2 B 58/13, 2 B 58/13 (2 C 6/14) KI-generiert

Whether circumstances equating a service offense with a theft exclude the mitigation ground of the property's low value

Geschäftsnummer 2 B 58/13, 2 B 58/13 (2 C 6/14)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for basic significance, allowing the case to proceed to the merits without determining the final substantive outcome. The dispute concerns a disciplinary proceeding against a civil servant for a service offense involving a theft-like access offense, specifically focusing on whether circumstances that justify equating a service offense with a theft offense simultaneously preclude the application of the mitigation factor for the low value of the property. The decision rests on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO and § 67 LDG NRW, addressing the legal question of whether the equivalence between a service offense and a theft offense excludes the recognized mitigation ground of property insignificance, a conflict identified in prior case law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW; Whether circumstances equating a service offense with a theft exclude the mitigation ground of the property's low value: The dispute concerns a disciplinary proceeding against a civil servant for a service offense involving a theft-like access offense, specifically focusing on whether circumstances that justify equating a service offense with a theft offense simultaneously preclude the application of the mitigation factor for the low value of the property. The decision rests on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO and § 67 LDG NRW, addressing the legal question of whether the equivalence between a service offense and a theft offense excludes the recognized mitigation ground of property insignificance, a conflict identified in prior case law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erschliessung des Grundstücks Streitwert Diebstahls Fall des Ausschlusses Rechtsmissbrauch mildernder Umstand
KI-generiert
KORE666182024
Lack of special public interest affirmation as procedural obstacle in prosecution for theft of low-value items
KORE720242025
Qualification of residential burglary in the operative part and application of the minor-value exception to aggravated theft in the sentencing assessment
JURE120013914
Scope of property servitude and valuation of appeal object based on incremental property value diminution
KORE702452026
Confiscation of stolen goods' value precluded by prior restitution; exclusion of cross-case offsetting due to per-case aggravation ban
KORE617812023
Dismissal of low-value theft conviction without special public interest and setting of missing fine day-rates

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited as the basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

§ 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW

Provision cited in conjunction with the federal procedural rule to authorize the admission of the appeal in this specific disciplinary matter.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Dienstvergehen; Zugriffsdelikt; Milderungsgrund der Geringwertigkeit der Sache; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zugelassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW). Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet zur Klärung der Frage beizutragen, ob Umstände, die die Gleichstellung eines Dienstvergehens mit einem Zugriffsdelikt rechtfertigen, zugleich dazu herangezogen werden können, den in der Rechtsprechung anerkannten Milderungsgrund der Geringwertigkeit der Sache auszuschließen (vgl. Urteil vom 11. Juni 2002 - BVerwG 1 D 31.01 - BVerwGE 116, 308 ).