Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6 B 20/13, 6 B 20/13 (6 C 39/13) KI-generiert

Transfer of licensed telecommunications public way rights to successor entity in statutory merger

Geschäftsnummer 6 B 20/13, 6 B 20/13 (6 C 39/13)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court (6th Senate) granted the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of revision, declaring the appeal admissible on grounds of fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the full appellate court for a substantive ruling on whether telecommunications way rights granted via licensing transfer to a successor entity in a statutory merger. The dispute concerned the succession of public path usage rights established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 during a corporate merger, challenging the lower court's refusal to review the specific legal question of right transferability in such reorganizations. The decision hinged on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), which permits admission of revision when a case can clarify a general legal question not yet decided by the Federal Administrative Court, specifically regarding the interplay between licensing conditions under Sections 6, 8, and 50 of the Telecommunications Act and the continuity of administrative rights upon the dissolution and transfer of assets.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG; Transfer of licensed telecommunications public way rights to successor entity in statutory merger: The dispute concerned the succession of public path usage rights established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 during a corporate merger, challenging the lower court's refusal to review the specific legal question of right transferability in such reorganizations. The decision hinged on Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), which permits admission of revision when a case can clarify a general legal question not yet decided by the Federal Administrative Court, specifically regarding the interplay between licensing conditions under Sections 6, 8, and 50 of the Telecommunications Act and the continuity of administrative rights upon the dissolution and transfer of assets.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vermögensübertragung gesetzlicher Anspruch juristische Person nicht-administrative Streitigkeit Wegrecht Zusammenschluss öffentlich-rechtlicher Körperschaften

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for admitting the revision based on the fundamental legal significance of the dispute regarding the transfer of telecommunication way rights in a merger.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for both the complaint and the revision procedure.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.
KI-generiert
6 C 39/13
Telecommunications right of way lacks transferability via corporate merger under TKG 2004
6 B 71/23
Telecommunications network access: sufficiency of functional dominance over terminal lines and deferral of conflict resolution to the standard offer
6 B 40/15
Stand of third-party competitor in merger-related frequency sharing permit; lack of Rechtsschutzbedürfnis and drittschützende Wirkung of § 55 Abs. 8 TKG
6 B 30/20, 6 B 30/20 (6 C 13/20)
Admissibility of revision: legal basis for imposing spectrum-sharing and infrastructure negotiation obligations on licensees in frequency allocation procurement rules
6 B 53/12, 6 B 53/12 (6 C 10/13)
Dependency of final telecommunications fee authorization on prior consultation and consolidation proceedings

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for admitting the revision based on the fundamental legal significance of the dispute regarding the transfer of telecommunication way rights in a merger.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for both the complaint and the revision procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Revisionszulassung; telekommunikationsrechtliches Wegerecht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob ein Recht zur Benutzung öffentlicher Wege, das im Rahmen der Erteilung einer Lizenz nach § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 Buchst. c, § 8 Abs. 1 bis 3, § 50 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes vom 25. Juli 1996 (BGBl I S. 1120) übertragen worden ist, im Fall einer Verschmelzung auf den übernehmenden Rechtsträger übergeht.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.