Valuation of services performed under § 50 SGB X following unlawful emergency custody of a minor under § 42 SGB VIII

The Federal Administrative Court permitted the appellant’s revision against the judgment of the Saxon Higher Administrative Court, finding that the case possesses fundamental legal significance for determining how performed services under § 50 Abs. 1 Satz 1 SGB X must be quantified following an unlawful emergency custody of a minor under § 42 SGB VIII. The dispute centers on the appropriate classification and valuation of social services rendered after an *Inobhutnahme* (taking into custody) was subsequently deemed to have been carried out in violation of the law. This decision focuses on the intersection of social law reimbursement principles and the procedural consequences of a defective initial custody measure, establishing that the legal uncertainty regarding the determination of these services justifies review at the highest administrative court level.