Admissibility of revision on whether AVV-Baulärm intervention values define the noise tolerance threshold for retail spaces under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG 7th Senate) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint and granted the defendant's leave to appeal, finding the appeal admissible due to the fundamental legal significance of the case. This decision concerns a plan approval proceeding where the dispute centers on the admissibility of a construction project and specifically the protection against construction noise. The court ordered that the pending revision proceedings be used to clarify whether and under what conditions the intervention values set by the Construction Noise Ordinance (AVV-Baulärm) are suitable to determine the threshold of tolerability for external noise affecting the contact area of retail spaces. The decisive legal basis for this admissibility determination is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, in conjunction with the substantive issues arising from § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG regarding the compatibility of the plan with noise protection standards.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Admissibility of revision on whether AVV-Baulärm intervention values define the noise tolerance threshold for retail spaces under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG: This decision concerns a plan approval proceeding where the dispute centers on the admissibility of a construction project and specifically the protection against construction noise. The court ordered that the pending revision proceedings be used to clarify whether and under what conditions the intervention values set by the Construction Noise Ordinance (AVV-Baulärm) are suitable to determine the threshold of tolerability for external noise affecting the contact area of retail spaces. The decisive legal basis for this admissibility determination is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, in conjunction with the substantive issues arising from § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG regarding the compatibility of the plan with noise protection standards.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for admitting the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Volltext
Planfeststellung; Schutz gegen Baulärm
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.
Das Revisionsverfahren kann Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Eingriffswerte der AVV-Baulärm im Rahmen eines Schutzanspruchs aus § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG i.V.m. § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG geeignet sind, die Zumutbarkeitsgrenze für Lärm im Außenkontaktbereich von Ladengeschäften zu bestimmen.