Land consolidation: statutory grounds for permitting revision on divergence from case law regarding interim orders
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the appellant's complaint and permitted a revision appeal, finding that the lower court's decision deviated from established case law regarding the requirements for temporary orders in land consolidation proceedings. The dispute concerned a challenge to a provisional directive issued during a land consolidation process, specifically addressing the legal standards for such interim measures under § 36(1) Sentence 1 of the Federal Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG). By allowing the revision on grounds of legal divergence, the court effectively reversed the lower instance's procedural ruling to ensure consistent application of the doctrine governing provisional administrative orders, while the temporary fee settlement was made pursuant to the Court Costs Act.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Land consolidation: statutory grounds for permitting revision on divergence from case law regarding interim orders: The dispute concerned a challenge to a provisional directive issued during a land consolidation process, specifically addressing the legal standards for such interim measures under § 36(1) Sentence 1 of the Federal Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG). By allowing the revision on grounds of legal divergence, the court effectively reversed the lower instance's procedural ruling to ensure consistent application of the doctrine governing provisional administrative orders, while the temporary fee settlement was made pursuant to the Court Costs Act.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for permitting the revision appeal due to deviation from established case law.
Provisions governing the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings and associated court costs.
Volltext
Flurbereinigung; vorläufige Anordnung
[GRUENDE]
Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO wegen Abweichung des angefochtenen Urteils von der ständigen Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts zu den Voraussetzungen einer vorläufigen Anordnung nach § 36 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FlurbG zuzulassen.
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.