Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6 B 64/10, 6 B 64/10 (6 C 12/11) KI-generiert

Photography of special forces personnel: interference with the general right to personality

Geschäftsnummer 6 B 64/10, 6 B 64/10 (6 C 12/11)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the appellant leave to appeal on the ground that the case holds fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the proceeding to progress to a full substantive review by the 6th Senate. The dispute concerns whether the act of photographing a member of the special forces (GSG 9) constitutes a specific interference with the individual's general right to personality, challenging the adequacy of privacy protections for identifiable security personnel in public. The decisive legal basis involves the interpretation of the general right to personality under constitutional law and the procedural standards for admitting revision under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, specifically focusing on the lack of sufficient existing case law clarification regarding the threshold for intrusive recording of state agents.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 5 ZPO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO; Photography of special forces personnel: interference with the general right to personality: The dispute concerns whether the act of photographing a member of the special forces (GSG 9) constitutes a specific interference with the individual's general right to personality, challenging the adequacy of privacy protections for identifiable security personnel in public. The decisive legal basis involves the interpretation of the general right to personality under constitutional law and the procedural standards for admitting revision under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, specifically focusing on the lack of sufficient existing case law clarification regarding the threshold for intrusive recording of state agents.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Persönlichkeitsschutz Verfahrensrechte Grundrechte Militärpersonen Revisionsgründe Vollstreckung
KI-generiert
WBRE410018707
Police prohibition of photographing special forces and seizure threat: Press freedom versus anonymity, with publication-stage controls satisfying proportionality.
KORE317562022
Permissibility of publishing an unredacted photo of a police officer wearing controversial symbols during a deployment, balancing press freedom against the right to personality und
KVRE424341801
Conflict between freedom of art and right to personality in large-scale public street photography
KORE307832022
Whether publication of a police officer’s identifiable image wearing right-wing patches during a counter-demonstration unlawfully infringes personality rights by asserting extremis
KORE304682022
Image publication of police officer wearing controversial patches during duty: Balancing public interest in police neutrality against personality rights under contemporary history

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO

Provisions determining the setting of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions determining the preliminary amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Fotografieren eines SEK-Beamten

[GRUENDE]

1. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das angestrebte Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob bereits das Fotografieren einen speziellen Eingriff in das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht eines SEK-Beamten darstellt.

2. Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.