Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
7 B 77/10, 7 B 77/10 (7 C 9/11) KI-generiert

Church membership withdrawal: validity of additional statements and constitutional interpretation requirements

Geschäftsnummer 7 B 77/10, 7 B 77/10 (7 C 9/11)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) allowed the defendant's complaint against the lower court's refusal to grant leave for appeal, finding that the case involves a question of fundamental legal significance and ordering the case to proceed to the appellate review. The dispute concerned the validity of a church membership withdrawal declaration challenged for containing an impermissible addition, raising the issue of which requirements apply when determining the unconstitutionality of such additions under a conforming interpretation. The decisive legal basis was Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), specifically regarding the criterion of fundamental significance for admitting revision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Church membership withdrawal: validity of additional statements and constitutional interpretation requirements: The dispute concerned the validity of a church membership withdrawal declaration challenged for containing an impermissible addition, raising the issue of which requirements apply when determining the unconstitutionality of such additions under a conforming interpretation. The decisive legal basis was Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO), specifically regarding the criterion of fundamental significance for admitting revision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
verfassungsmässige Anforderung Feststellung der Gültigkeit Mitgliedschaft protestantisches Kirchenrecht Glaubens- und Gewissensfreiheit Wandelungsrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited in the decision to justify the admissibility of the revision on the grounds of fundamental legal significance.
KI-generiert
I B 146/11
Constitutional validity of deriving Evangelical church tax liability from baptism and residence despite subsequent church exit
6 C 7/12
Validity of conditional church exit declarations limited to the public-law corporation status under the Church Tax Act
2 BvR 1140/15
Insufficient substantiation of church self-determination limits in dismissal following revocation of canonical mandate
V ZR 156/12
Validity of church law integrating a registered association into a public-law religious corporation and terminating its legal existence
2 BvR 328/16
Exhaustion of internal religious discipline procedures and judicial protection for expulsion from a religious community

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited in the decision to justify the admissibility of the revision on the grounds of fundamental legal significance.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kirchenaustrittserklärung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. In einem Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich die Frage geklärt werden, welche Anforderungen bei einer verfassungskonformen Auslegung an die Annahme eines unzulässigen Zusatzes bei einer Kirchenaustrittserklärung zu stellen sind.