Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
3 B 76/10, 3 B 76/10 (3 C 9/11) KI-generiert

Recognition of foreign EU driver’s license despite issuance in violation of residence requirement under § 28 Abs. 4 FeV

Geschäftsnummer 3 B 76/10, 3 B 76/10 (3 C 9/11)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Administrative Court of Appeal granted the appeal for leave to file a revision, finding the case to be of fundamental legal significance; the case is remanded to the Federal Administrative Court for a final decision, with provisional value in dispute set for the revision proceedings. The dispute concerned the validity of a foreign EU driver's license recognized in Germany, specifically whether such a license remains valid despite having been issued in violation of the residence requirement under the host member state's regulations. The decisive legal basis for granting leave to revise was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the need for clarification on the applicability of § 28 Abs. 4 FeV in cases where an EU driver's license was issued under an obvious breach of the residence requirement.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Recognition of foreign EU driver’s license despite issuance in violation of residence requirement under § 28 Abs. 4 FeV: The dispute concerned the validity of a foreign EU driver's license recognized in Germany, specifically whether such a license remains valid despite having been issued in violation of the residence requirement under the host member state's regulations. The decisive legal basis for granting leave to revise was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the need for clarification on the applicability of § 28 Abs. 4 FeV in cases where an EU driver's license was issued under an obvious breach of the residence requirement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
"Vorläufige Geltung" Anerkennung ausländischer Entscheide Residenzpflicht europäischer Rechtsstatus Führerausweisentzug Revisionsverfahren
KI-generiert
WBRE410018145
Refusal of recognition of foreign EU driver's license following prior domestic revocation under Directive 2006/126/EC
WBRE201900905
Persistence of EU license residence requirement violation through license exchange and analogous application of German driver's license regulations
WBRE410018170
Automatic ex-tunc non-recognition of foreign EU driving licenses violating the residence requirement under § 28(4) FeV without individual administrative decision
WBRE201900865
Denial of EU driver's license exchange based on rebutted presumption of residence in issuing Member State
WBRE202000170
EU driver license acquired during provisional domestic suspension: recognition denied where withdrawal grounds predated issuance

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting permission to file a revision based on the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions cited for the basis of the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Ausländische EU-Fahrerlaubnis; Gebrauchmachen im Inland; Verstoß gegen Wohnsitzerfordernis; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu. Sie wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, die Frage weiter zu klären, inwieweit § 28 Abs. 4 FeV anwendbar ist, wenn eine ausländische EU-Fahrerlaubnis unter einem offensichtlichen Verstoß gegen das Wohnsitzerfordernis erteilt wurde.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.