Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6 B 33/10, 6 B 33/10 (6 C 40/10) KI-generiert

Scope of Judicial Review for Discretion in Setting Telecommunications Spectrum Allocation Conditions

Geschäftsnummer 6 B 33/10, 6 B 33/10 (6 C 40/10)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court quashed the order denying leave to appeal and remanded the case for merits review, determining that the plaintiff's complaint was well-founded and establishing the fundamental significance of the issue. The dispute concerned a telecommunications procedure where the plaintiff challenged the allocation conditions set by the Federal Network Agency, specifically questioning the legal standards for the exercise of discretion in licensing spectrum usage rights. The court held that the matter is of fundamental importance for clarifying the extent to which the administrative agency possesses a judicially reviewable discretionary and planning margin under § 61(4) sentence 2 of the Telecommunications Act (TKG) when establishing such conditions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 61 Abs. 4 Satz 2 TKG; Scope of Judicial Review for Discretion in Setting Telecommunications Spectrum Allocation Conditions: The dispute concerned a telecommunications procedure where the plaintiff challenged the allocation conditions set by the Federal Network Agency, specifically questioning the legal standards for the exercise of discretion in licensing spectrum usage rights. The court held that the matter is of fundamental importance for clarifying the extent to which the administrative agency possesses a judicially reviewable discretionary and planning margin under § 61(4) sentence 2 of the Telecommunications Act (TKG) when establishing such conditions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
richterliches Ermessen Kognitionsbefugnis Streitgegenstand Verwaltungsbeschwerde Bewilligungsverfahren Grundrechte

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for quashing the order denying leave to appeal, as the court determined the case had fundamental legal significance.
§ 61 Abs. 4 Satz 2 TKG
Substantive provision at issue in the dispute regarding the Federal Network Agency's discretion in setting allocation conditions.
KI-generiert
6 C 41/10
Scope of judicial review over Federal Network Agency’s discretion to design telecom frequency auction rules
1 BvR 1932/08
Scope of judicial review over regulatory agency’s market definition and discretion in telecom market regulation
6 C 40/10
Scope of judicial review over regulatory discretion in defining frequency auction conditions and relevant markets under TKG
6 B 14/14, 6 B 14/14 (6 C 42/14)
Scope of judicial review over regulatory agency discretion in calculating efficient hourly rates for one-time telecommunications fees under the TKG
6 C 3/10
Frequency allocation mandate: Judicial review of scarcity prognosis and the exclusion of individual assignment for time-limited rights holders

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for quashing the order denying leave to appeal, as the court determined the case had fundamental legal significance.

§ 61 Abs. 4 Satz 2 TKG

Substantive provision at issue in the dispute regarding the Federal Network Agency's discretion in setting allocation conditions.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Telekommunikation; Beurteilungsspielraum bei der Festlegung der Vergabebedingungen; Frequenznutzungsrecht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und inwieweit der Bundesnetzagentur bei der Festlegung der Vergabebedingungen (§ 61 Abs. 4 Satz 2 TKG) ein gerichtlich nur eingeschränkt überprüfbarer Beurteilungs- bzw. Gestaltungsspielraum zusteht.