Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
2 WNB 3/19, 2 WNB 3/19 (2 WRB 1/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:051119B2WNB3.19.0 KI-generiert

Military disciplinary law: Effect of late-hour complaint filing to garrison duty officer on statutory deadline preservation

Geschäftsnummer 2 WNB 3/19, 2 WNB 3/19 (2 WRB 1/19)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the service member's legal complaint, ruling in his favor on the procedural motion to allow the appeal to proceed to the merits, thereby setting aside the lower court's rejection of the complaint as inadmissible. The dispute concerned a military disciplinary proceeding in which the superior officer filed a disciplinary complaint at the officer on duty of the garrison after regular working hours had ended, rather than through the competent disciplinary authority, raising the issue of whether this action constituted a time-limit preserving filing under § 6 Abs. 1 WBO. The court determined that the case presents a question of fundamental legal significance requiring clarification of whether and under what conditions a disciplinary superior, who is absent after work hours, must be credited with the filing submitted to the garrison's officer on duty as a valid legal entry that meets the statutory deadline.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 22a Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WBO, § 22b Abs. 4 Satz 1 WBO; Military disciplinary law: Effect of late-hour complaint filing to garrison duty officer on statutory deadline preservation: The dispute concerned a military disciplinary proceeding in which the superior officer filed a disciplinary complaint at the officer on duty of the garrison after regular working hours had ended, rather than through the competent disciplinary authority, raising the issue of whether this action constituted a time-limit preserving filing under § 6 Abs. 1 WBO. The court determined that the case presents a question of fundamental legal significance requiring clarification of whether and under what conditions a disciplinary superior, who is absent after work hours, must be credited with the filing submitted to the garrison's officer on duty as a valid legal entry that meets the statutory deadline.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Militärdisziplinarrecht gesetzliche Verfahrensfrist Verwaltungsbeschwerde Stundenfrist Wehrpflicht Urteile zur Prüfung der Gültigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 22a Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WBO
Main legal basis for the admission of the legal complaint (Rechtsbeschwerde) due to a question of fundamental significance.
§ 22b Abs. 4 Satz 1 WBO
Procedural basis for the panel composition without lay judges to decide on the admissibility of the legal complaint.
KI-generiert
2 WRB 1/19
Timeliness of military disciplinary complaint delivered to officer on guard duty: attribution of late receipt via good faith and organizational duties
2 WRB 2/12
Military disciplinary complaint: obligation of lower court to set deadline for statement of reasons despite parties' request for file review
2 WD 1/17
Military disciplinary sanction mitigation due to excessive procedure duration violating right to be heard in reasonable time
1 WRB 1/16
Timeliness of administrative complaint as prerequisite for judicial review under § 17 Abs. 1 WBO
1 WB 42/23
Military Service Complaint Admissibility: Expiration of One-Month Filing Deadline and Non-Actionability of Procedural Misconduct

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 22a Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WBO

Main legal basis for the admission of the legal complaint (Rechtsbeschwerde) due to a question of fundamental significance.

§ 22b Abs. 4 Satz 1 WBO

Procedural basis for the panel composition without lay judges to decide on the admissibility of the legal complaint.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde in Fristfragen

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers, über die der Senat gemäß § 22b Abs. 4 Satz 1 WBO in der Besetzung ohne ehrenamtliche Richter entscheidet, ist gemäß § 22a Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Nr. 1 WBO zuzulassen. Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der grundsätzlichen Frage geben, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen sich ein nach Dienstschluss abwesender Disziplinarvorgesetzter die Abgabe einer Beschwerde beim Offizier vom Wachdienst der Kaserne im Rahmen des § 6 Abs. 1 WBO als fristwahrende Einlegung zurechnen lassen muss.